Typical situation no. 4
A young company plans an AI inference data center in three phases: 10 MW in 2027, 25 MW in 2029, 40 MW in 2031. Its funding covers only the first phase. It is weighing a 10 MW connection request, which is faster, against a 40 MW request, which is more expensive and takes longer.
WHAT IS BLOCKING
- Requesting 10 MW today may mean filing a full new request, with a new lead time, to reach 40 MW.
- Requesting 40 MW now commits deposits and works sized for capacity that is not yet funded.
- The choice determines the connection voltage, the substation to be built and the site's electrical architecture.
WHAT WE DO
- Analysis of the applicable connection rules and of the options for a gradual capacity increase.
- Simulation of two or three strategies: cost, schedule, risks, financial commitment at each stage.
- Sizing of the substation and electrical architecture so as not to block later phases.
WHAT YOU GET
- A phased connection strategy, costed and dated.
- The points to negotiate with the grid operator.
- A memo usable in the fundraising pack.
Typical format: Advisory engagement, about two weeks. Every assignment is scoped in writing before it starts.
THE EXPERT FOR THIS
Typical situation, based on real enquiries and anonymised. Figures are illustrative.
RELATED SITUATIONS
Our RTE connection offer states energisation in 2032. Is that credible?We have an RTE exploratory study for 120 MW but no connection offer (PTF). Can we sign the promise of sale for the land?The primary substation 4 km away shows capacity, but Enedis mentions reinforcement. Is 12 MW at MV (HTA) realistic?Our 12 ha plot is in an AU zone of the local land-use plan (PLU). Can we build a 60 MW data center on it?See all 50 situations →