Typical situation no. 67
A fund owns a 15 MW data center leased mostly to a neocloud. Markets worry about such players' debt. The fund wants to know whether the site could be re-let quickly, to whom and with what works, before talking to its tenant and lenders.
WHAT IS BLOCKING
- Site value currently rests on a single tenant.
- Installations were adapted to that tenant, not necessarily to the market.
- The fund lacks an independent technical view to negotiate.
WHAT WE DO
- Technical review: power, density, cooling, redundancy, condition.
- Analysis of the site's fit for other tenant types.
- Estimate of works needed to re-let, and their timing.
- Points to prepare for tenant and lender discussions.
WHAT YOU GET
- A clear view of the site's technical value, independent of the current tenant.
- A costed list of works to re-let.
- Solid arguments to negotiate.
Typical format: Technical review, three to four weeks. Every assignment is scoped in writing before it starts.
THE EXPERT FOR THIS
Typical situation, based on real enquiries and anonymised. Figures are illustrative.
RELATED SITUATIONS
We are financing 60 MW. The sponsor says it has a signed connection offer (PTF). What is it really worth?Our fund owns three 2 to 6 MW data centers built between 2010 and 2016. Will they still be lettable in ten years?Our fund is classified Article 9. Which data center metrics can we actually document?Ahead of an acquisition, we have four weeks to complete the technical review of an operating 12 MW site.See all 68 situations →